data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc58b/cc58b0163a9c137d13a306da6d93acdf3c577161" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/500d8/500d8a64051d719ada1e73bb8e20de5b30b9201c" alt=""
Apparently v2.0 recovers flux better at all scales than v1.0. However, it is noisier. The full comparison is available here. The trustworthy range of flux scales is 1.2-1.6ish. The flux is increased at ALL scales in most images. However, as was noted in comparisons with MAMBO, there may be curvature in the best-fit lines. Also, l=35 does not appear to scale up linearly... G34 is fainter in v2.0? In the low S/N fields, the PSD is more reliable than the pixel-pixel comparison.