Notes from the ISM-PP conference Day 3

Mordecai Mac-Low: Stellar Feedback

SNe explode away from their birthplaces
  • ionizing radiation contains 10x more energy than SNe
  • outer disk SF inadequate to explain kinetic energy observed
  • "almost constant velocity dispersion in HI in local universe"
  • ionization escape determined within 1pc (Peters) + fragmentation starvation
  • At high mass, high escape velocity, there is less unbound material
  • stellar winds relatively unimportant because of their rarity + B-stars give SNe, but not wind
Radiation Pressure
  • more effective if more scattering + Krumholz & Matzner, Fall: Momentum Driven (0-1 scatterings) + Thomson, Murray, Hopkins: Energy Driven (many-scattering)
  • Multi-scattering fails: RT instability + scattered radiation never dominant
  • Lopez 2013: HII-region pressure always dominant; hot gas slightly lower
  • Q Fan of CR driven winds. Galactic winds are multi-phase. Thoughts?
  • A:
  • Q Thomas Henning: What about positive feedback?
  • A: Will be addressed in next talk. But, positive feedback is a 10% effect

Molecular cloud formation in stellar feedback flows: Observing, demonstrating, quantifying: Joanne Dawson

HI GASS + 12CO
  • effect of supershells on molecular gas fraction + shells are more molecular than surroundings
  • LMC: supergiant shells have comparable molecular gas fraction to the rest of the gas + Large scale: No effect + small scale: drive up local molecular gas fraction
  • OB cluster feedback: Not a major driver, but an important secondary role
  • Q Zinnecker: How did 30 Dor form?

Disruption of GMCs by photoionization and stellar winds - setting the stage for supernovae. Jim Dale

The time between first O-stars and first SNe
  • mass loss is a strong effect of escape speed
  • Leakage? Approximate winds as momentum fluxes + leakage rate constant across M/R space
  • Effect of 1st SN? + no effect/small effect for high-mass clouds

Do you have predictions for velocity of knots as a function of distance or time? Rocket effect? Can "Rocket Effect" drive out gas?

The evolution of molecular clouds under the influence of ionizing radiation 15': Matthias Gritschneder

Pipe Nebula affected by feedback O vs B star

  • B-star does not generate structure + heats shell + stays very smooth
  • O-star compresses

Feedback-driven turbulence in the multi-phase ISM 15': Andrea Gotto (MPA)

Cannot reproduce HI velocity dispersion

Understanding ultracompact H II regions 15': Thomas Peters

HII region morphologies
  • no relation between age of star and size of HII region
  • probabilistic flux decrements
  • SgrB2: 1 shrinking, 2-3 growing + predictions & observations match exactly
  • ALMA outflow predictions
  • K 3-50A VLA + CARMA observations + Pamela Klaasen 14.7 GHz obs of K3-50a + ionized gas entraining molecular gas
  • models do not include dust absorption

ALMA proposal for Sgr B2? Prediction for 3mm observability?

An analytic model for the dynamics of the ionized outflows of massive protostars 15': Keto

Observations that aren't explained by expanding shell
  • supersonic velocities in HII region
  • SED indicates density gradients
  • Modified Hollenbach photoevaporating disk model + velocity gradient of RRL not tied to disk or outflow + "Ballistic Infall" model
  • Q: Look similar to simulations of champagne flows.

Deciphering the violent interaction between very massive stars and their natal clouds in the Carina Nebula Complex 15': Thomas Preibisch

Carina:
  • HAWK-I NIR stellar population study
  • CCCP Chandra 10,000 stars
  • 60,000 msun in gas
  • 10^6 msun total... half cold
  • 300,000 msun of CO
  • 1% of total SF in galaxy
  • G0 ~100-1000
  • hot wind gas (X-ray) flows out: anticorrelated with 70um Herschel
  • Q How do you know SFE is increasing (currently 3%)?
  • A: We see it going on now. Stellar mass is increasing. Efficiency must increase further.
  • Q Nicola Schneider: What if the pillars are eroded filaments? Revealed, not triggered?
  • A: Same mechanism? (unclear)
  • Q Hennebelle: Where is most of the mass? only 1/3 in CO?
  • A: 1/2 - 2/3 still in atomic gas

Models for the circumstellar medium of massive runaway stars 15': Dominic Meyer

Bow shocks from runaway RSGs
  • v*/vwind >> 1 -> stable bow shock + slow stars -> unstable

Dynamics of H II regions around exiled O stars 15': Jonathan Mackey

25% of O-stars ejected
  • once in diffuse ISM, easier to feedback on Galactic scales
  • Zeta Ophiuci d~112pc, proper motion known, LOS velocity unknown
  • bow shock is 5 degrees! across, ~10pc

Comments