Mordecai Mac-Low: Stellar Feedback
- SNe explode away from their birthplaces
- ionizing radiation contains 10x more energy than SNe
- outer disk SF inadequate to explain kinetic energy observed
- "almost constant velocity dispersion in HI in local universe"
- ionization escape determined within 1pc (Peters) + fragmentation starvation
- At high mass, high escape velocity, there is less unbound material
- stellar winds relatively unimportant because of their rarity + B-stars give SNe, but not wind
- Radiation Pressure
- more effective if more scattering + Krumholz & Matzner, Fall: Momentum Driven (0-1 scatterings) + Thomson, Murray, Hopkins: Energy Driven (many-scattering)
- Multi-scattering fails: RT instability + scattered radiation never dominant
- Lopez 2013: HII-region pressure always dominant; hot gas slightly lower
- Q Fan of CR driven winds. Galactic winds are multi-phase. Thoughts?
- A:
- Q Thomas Henning: What about positive feedback?
- A: Will be addressed in next talk. But, positive feedback is a 10% effect
Molecular cloud formation in stellar feedback flows: Observing, demonstrating, quantifying: Joanne Dawson
- HI GASS + 12CO
- effect of supershells on molecular gas fraction + shells are more molecular than surroundings
- LMC: supergiant shells have comparable molecular gas fraction to the rest of the gas + Large scale: No effect + small scale: drive up local molecular gas fraction
- OB cluster feedback: Not a major driver, but an important secondary role
- Q Zinnecker: How did 30 Dor form?
Disruption of GMCs by photoionization and stellar winds - setting the stage for supernovae. Jim Dale
- The time between first O-stars and first SNe
- mass loss is a strong effect of escape speed
- Leakage? Approximate winds as momentum fluxes + leakage rate constant across M/R space
- Effect of 1st SN? + no effect/small effect for high-mass clouds
Do you have predictions for velocity of knots as a function of distance or time? Rocket effect? Can "Rocket Effect" drive out gas?
The evolution of molecular clouds under the influence of ionizing radiation 15': Matthias Gritschneder
Pipe Nebula affected by feedback O vs B star
- B-star does not generate structure + heats shell + stays very smooth
- O-star compresses
Feedback-driven turbulence in the multi-phase ISM 15': Andrea Gotto (MPA)
Cannot reproduce HI velocity dispersion
Understanding ultracompact H II regions 15': Thomas Peters
- HII region morphologies
- no relation between age of star and size of HII region
- probabilistic flux decrements
- SgrB2: 1 shrinking, 2-3 growing + predictions & observations match exactly
- ALMA outflow predictions
- K 3-50A VLA + CARMA observations + Pamela Klaasen 14.7 GHz obs of K3-50a + ionized gas entraining molecular gas
- models do not include dust absorption
ALMA proposal for Sgr B2? Prediction for 3mm observability?
An analytic model for the dynamics of the ionized outflows of massive protostars 15': Keto
- Observations that aren't explained by expanding shell
- supersonic velocities in HII region
- SED indicates density gradients
- Modified Hollenbach photoevaporating disk model + velocity gradient of RRL not tied to disk or outflow + "Ballistic Infall" model
- Q: Look similar to simulations of champagne flows.
Deciphering the violent interaction between very massive stars and their natal clouds in the Carina Nebula Complex 15': Thomas Preibisch
- Carina:
- HAWK-I NIR stellar population study
- CCCP Chandra 10,000 stars
- 60,000 msun in gas
- 10^6 msun total... half cold
- 300,000 msun of CO
- 1% of total SF in galaxy
- G0 ~100-1000
- hot wind gas (X-ray) flows out: anticorrelated with 70um Herschel
- Q How do you know SFE is increasing (currently 3%)?
- A: We see it going on now. Stellar mass is increasing. Efficiency must increase further.
- Q Nicola Schneider: What if the pillars are eroded filaments? Revealed, not triggered?
- A: Same mechanism? (unclear)
- Q Hennebelle: Where is most of the mass? only 1/3 in CO?
- A: 1/2 - 2/3 still in atomic gas
Models for the circumstellar medium of massive runaway stars 15': Dominic Meyer
- Bow shocks from runaway RSGs
- v*/vwind >> 1 -> stable bow shock + slow stars -> unstable
Dynamics of H II regions around exiled O stars 15': Jonathan Mackey
- 25% of O-stars ejected
- once in diffuse ISM, easier to feedback on Galactic scales
- Zeta Ophiuci d~112pc, proper motion known, LOS velocity unknown
- bow shock is 5 degrees! across, ~10pc